Skip to main content

SASS Converts Zero Opacity 'rgba' To 'transparent'

I recently had a strange problem after updating SASS. I have a modal dialog with a semi-transparent overlay behind it. For modern browsers, I'm using a CSS transition from

rgba(0,0,0,0)
to
rgba(0,0,0,.5)

For older browsers (namely IE8), I'm using some JavaScript to apply the transparency and animate the transition. To make sure the background gets set correctly, I'm using the standard fallback strategy of defining the background as background: rgb(0,0,0); right before the rgba line.

This worked fine, until SASS optimized my code by changing

background: rgba(0,0,0,0);
to
background: transparent;

The reason? It's 2 characters shorter. Yes, we've now saved 2 bytes of easily compressible text in exchange for breaking my code.

Why did it break? Well, if you haven't already figured it out, normally a browser that doesn't support rgba will simply skip that property and move on. But transparent is supported. So now, instead of having a black background that I would later animate the opacity, I'm animating the opacity of a transparent background.

To fix this, I simply forced SASS to output the exact text I wanted.

#{rgba(0,0,0,0);}
It's not ideal, and I probably could have changed my code so that I didn't have to be in this situation at all. But this was the quickest, most straightforward solution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CSS line-height Units Explained

In Chris Coyier's recent article, " Fun with line-height! ", he mentions that we often use unitless values for line-height so that it's proportional to the font size. This is only part of the story, and I was reminded of a Stack Overflow question that got me investigating more about how line-height worked with regards to the various CSS units. If you're declaring the line-height on each element, you won't notice any difference. But if you're not crazy and using the first C of CSS (that's 'Cascading', by the way), then the inherited line-height might not work the way you expect. Disclaimer: This is my understanding after doing some research and testing. I may not be completely correct. TL;DR When using a relative unit (em, %), the line-height is calculated based on the font size of the element where the line-height is defined. This line-height is then inherited, unchanged, by each of its descendants. So we end up with a line...

Naming Booleans

Naming conventions are one of those little things that can become a big thing when you multiply the scale of the project and/or people involved. I was just looking through some code yesterday, and I saw a variable with a fairly typical boolean name that followed the format isObjectState This felt awkward to me, and I took a moment to consider why this is. In Logic, a boolean is a statement that is either true or false . However, this variable name is written as a yes or no question. It is an easy misconception to equate true with yes and false with no , but though they are similar, they are not exactly the same, and, especially as programmers, we should not treat them as such. When we expand our variables into full sentences, the awkwardness becomes more apparent. Especially when we insert them into control structures. Let’s rename our variable to: is this menu item active? So our control blocks will read: if is this menu item active?, then highlight it. while is this men...

Get width and height of a remote image with VB .NET

The Problem I wanted to grab the width and height of an image that was on a remote server. I've done this with PHP, but never in .NET. The Solution I did a little digging and came across this code (slightly modified for my own purposes). Dim request As HttpWebRequest = DirectCast(WebRequest.Create(URL), HttpWebRequest) request.Method = "GET" request.Accept = "image/*" Dim response As HttpWebResponse = DirectCast(request.GetResponse(), HttpWebResponse) Dim s As Stream = response.GetResponseStream() Dim bmp As New Bitmap(s) Width = bmp.Width Height = bmp.Height