Skip to main content

When Table Cells are Smaller than the Table

I ran into an issue at work the other day that was a bit strange. A portion of one of our forms is using tables for layout (Yeah, I know... it's older code), in all other browsers the fields lined up with the others on the page, but in IE9 there was some unexpected extra space throwing the layout all off.

I took a look, and noticed a few things:

  • The table had a fixed width of 690px
  • There were only two columns in the entire table, but the second cell had colspan='2'
  • Both table cells had a fixed width
  • The sum of the table cells widths (including padding and all) was less than the width of the entire table

So what does all of this mean?

Well, the main issue is that, since the total width of the cells is less than that of the table, the browser has to figure out what to do with the leftover space.

Let's see what happens (I'm leaving off the colspan and adding some extra elements for demonstration purposes).

cell 1 cell 2
cell 1 cell 2

So it looks like the browser is distributing that extra, unaccounted space across the cells. And if you look close enough, that space should be divided so that the original proportions are preserved. That makes a certain amount of sense. But that's now what we wanted, so how do we fix it?

Well, the people before me set colspan='2' on the second cells. In most browsers, this essentially assumes a non-existant column that can be any width, which absorbs the extra space. All, that is, except IE9 (and maybe higher?).

Here's the table using the colspan trick.

cell 1 cell 2
cell 1 cell 2

But like I mentioned earlier, we found this doesn't work in IE9 (at least). This colspan business seems a bit hacky to me anyway, so I'm not sure I like it to begin with. So what now?

Well, in our situation anyway, the solution was easy... Take the fixed width off of the second column. That allows the column to flow freely and fill in the remaining space. We could have also removed the width from the table, but there was less risk of breaking something somewhere else by changing the cell width.

With the width removed from the second cell, things work as you would expect. This is one reason I don't like using fixed sizes for child elements. I prefer using proportional measurements (where it makes sense, of course. Sometimes you need those fixed sizes).

cell 1 cell 2
cell 1 cell 2
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Flags vs Vendor Prefixes for Experimental CSS

Google recently announced that it will be switching Chrome's rendering engine to a fork of Webkit, called “Blink”. If you're interested, you can read their blog post about Blink . One of the changes we will be seeing in Blink, is the use of browser flags in place of vendor prefixes . What this means, is that rather than prefixing experimental CSS with -webkit-, -moz-, -ms-, -o-, -khtml-, etc.; We will be required to enable these attributes using a flag in the browser (like the ones currently at chrome://flags). If you ask me, both ways have their advantages and disadvantages. Though, in the end, I lean towards the flags over the vendor prefixes, and here's why: #1 Code Bloat On average, using CSS with vendor prefixes requires writing it 5 times . Every time you use it . #2 Future Friendly Eventually, prefixed code will be replaced by the unprefixed code. #3 Browser Dev Friendly Browsers tend to continue to support the prefixed code, even if it doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Element.focus() in IE9 running Jasmine tests with Karma

I recently udpated our Jasmine unit tests to run in Karma ; expanding our browser coverage, adding code coverage reports , and using fixtures for testing DOM manipulation . One of my tests kept failing in IE9, but only when I ran from the console. If I attempted to debug in the browser, everything passed. It turns out that IE9 (at least) needed a few ms to catch it's breath before correctly focusing on the starting element. To do this, I just added a 100ms delay before each test ran (Using Jasmine 2.3). beforeEach(function(done){ loadFixtures('myfixture.html'); // Setting focus in IE requires a delay to work correctly! setTimeout(function(){ done(); }, 100); });
Post a Comment
Read more

Get width and height of a remote image with VB .NET

The Problem I wanted to grab the width and height of an image that was on a remote server. I've done this with PHP, but never in .NET. The Solution I did a little digging and came across this code (slightly modified for my own purposes). Dim request As HttpWebRequest = DirectCast(WebRequest.Create(URL), HttpWebRequest) request.Method = "GET" request.Accept = "image/*" Dim response As HttpWebResponse = DirectCast(request.GetResponse(), HttpWebResponse) Dim s As Stream = response.GetResponseStream() Dim bmp As New Bitmap(s) Width = bmp.Width Height = bmp.Height
Post a Comment
Read more