I ran into an issue at work the other day that was a bit strange. A portion of one of our forms is using tables for layout (Yeah, I know... it's older code), in all other browsers the fields lined up with the others on the page, but in IE9 there was some unexpected extra space throwing the layout all off.
I took a look, and noticed a few things:
- The table had a fixed width of 690px
- There were only two columns in the entire table, but the second cell had
colspan='2'
- Both table cells had a fixed width
- The sum of the table cells widths (including padding and all) was less than the width of the entire table
So what does all of this mean?
Well, the main issue is that, since the total width of the cells is less than that of the table, the browser has to figure out what to do with the leftover space.
Let's see what happens (I'm leaving off the colspan
and adding some extra elements for demonstration purposes).
cell 1 | cell 2 |
cell 1 | cell 2 |
So it looks like the browser is distributing that extra, unaccounted space across the cells. And if you look close enough, that space should be divided so that the original proportions are preserved. That makes a certain amount of sense. But that's now what we wanted, so how do we fix it?
Well, the people before me set colspan='2'
on the second cells. In most browsers, this essentially assumes a non-existant column that can be any width, which absorbs the extra space. All, that is, except IE9 (and maybe higher?).
colspan
trick.
cell 1 | cell 2 | |
cell 1 | cell 2 |
But like I mentioned earlier, we found this doesn't work in IE9 (at least). This colspan business seems a bit hacky to me anyway, so I'm not sure I like it to begin with. So what now?
Well, in our situation anyway, the solution was easy... Take the fixed width off of the second column. That allows the column to flow freely and fill in the remaining space. We could have also removed the width from the table, but there was less risk of breaking something somewhere else by changing the cell width.
With the width removed from the second cell, things work as you would expect. This is one reason I don't like using fixed sizes for child elements. I prefer using proportional measurements (where it makes sense, of course. Sometimes you need those fixed sizes).
cell 1 | cell 2 |
cell 1 | cell 2 |
Comments
Post a Comment