Skip to main content

Use parseInt Correctly

Something else I just learned today. I've been happily using parseInt all this time, and I've been doing it wrong.

I never really thought much about it. "Ok, let's change this string to an integer. parseInt(string) Bang. Done."

But then I got a warning when compiling my code with Google's Closure Compiler saying that I needed two parameters. Wait, what?

Turns out, there is a second parameter for the Radix that you should always fill in. This makes sense, of course, but apparently I assumed everyone used base ten. Always. That was pretty dumb, and here's why:

  • If the input string begins with "0x" or "0X", radix is 16 (hexadecimal).
  • If the input string begins with "0", radix is eight (octal). This feature is non-standard, and some implementations deliberately do not support it (instead using the radix 10). For this reason always specify a radix when using parseInt.
  • If the input string begins with any other value, the radix is 10 (decimal).
from the parseInt definition on MDN

Needless to say, I'll be using both parameters from now on! (Yes, even though this is not as important since ECMAScript 5, that's still pretty new).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SASS Converts Zero Opacity 'rgba' To 'transparent'

I recently had a strange problem after updating SASS. I have a modal dialog with a semi-transparent overlay behind it. For modern browsers, I'm using a CSS transition from rgba(0,0,0,0) to rgba(0,0,0,.5) For older browsers (namely IE8), I'm using some JavaScript to apply the transparency and animate the transition. To make sure the background gets set correctly, I'm using the standard fallback strategy of defining the background as background: rgb(0,0,0); right before the rgba line. This worked fine, until SASS optimized my code by changing background: rgba(0,0,0,0); to background: transparent; The reason? It's 2 characters shorter. Yes, we've now saved 2 bytes of easily compressible text in exchange for breaking my code. Why did it break? Well, if you haven't already figured it out, normally a browser that doesn't support rgba will simply skip that property and move on. But transparent is supported. So now, instead of h...

Flags vs Vendor Prefixes for Experimental CSS

Google recently announced that it will be switching Chrome's rendering engine to a fork of Webkit, called “Blink”. If you're interested, you can read their blog post about Blink . One of the changes we will be seeing in Blink, is the use of browser flags in place of vendor prefixes . What this means, is that rather than prefixing experimental CSS with -webkit-, -moz-, -ms-, -o-, -khtml-, etc.; We will be required to enable these attributes using a flag in the browser (like the ones currently at chrome://flags). If you ask me, both ways have their advantages and disadvantages. Though, in the end, I lean towards the flags over the vendor prefixes, and here's why: #1 Code Bloat On average, using CSS with vendor prefixes requires writing it 5 times . Every time you use it . #2 Future Friendly Eventually, prefixed code will be replaced by the unprefixed code. #3 Browser Dev Friendly Browsers tend to continue to support the prefixed code, even if it doesn...

Automatically Calculating Foreground Color using SASS

I ran into the problem, as I'm sure many others have, where I wanted to dynamically assign background colors to my components, but also needed to adjust the foreground color to be readable and visually appealing. It's easy for something to fall through the cracks when changing colors, and then we end up with unreadable text. So to try and avoid this, I put together a SASS function that selects a color for text based on the background color you give it. This also performs checks to make sure the contrast meets a given Accessibility spec (as per W3C rules). So far I've had pretty good results with it. Please feel free to tinker and use this in your own projects. It's far from perfect, but it has See the Pen Calculate Foreground Color by Thomas Pietrosanti ( @Rykus0 ) on CodePen .